[109886] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Security Intelligence [Was: Re: Netblock reassigned from Chile

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Sat Dec 13 03:51:21 2008

Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:51:13 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6cd462c00812130044k1178ba82kd0df6c3e7b2255d5@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

> The point I am trying to make here is that ISPs should much more engaged in
> this entire process.

most of the larger isps have reasonable security teams with some good 
folk.  but you need to be much more specific about what you want from 
medium and smaller isps, and what the immediate payoffs (cf. the 
financial secions of the newpaper) will be to them to justify the costs.

just whining that no one will come out to play is not a success 
strategy, as you say you have well demonstrated.

be specific, like "if you run X tools the payoff will be Y."

randy


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post