[109821] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 routing /48s
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Niels Bakker)
Tue Dec 9 18:33:23 2008
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:33:10 +0100
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <200811260218.mAQ2IQBU017165@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
* Mark_Andrews@isc.org (Mark Andrews) [Wed 26 Nov 2008, 03:20 CET]:
>It's used for both.
Yet from /usr/src/lib/libc/getaddrinfo.c
---
/* Rule 7: Prefer native transport. */
/* XXX: not implemented yet */
---
But it is not used to distinguish between 2001: and 2002: as ::/0 has a
higher precedence in the default FreeBSD IPv6 address selection policy
table. Where does FreeBSD and by extension KAME get its strong
preference for 2001: from? I just can't find the code.
(I'm reviving this old thread because you chose to ignore my mail to you
but did not fail to reply to a single mail I sent to the list concerning
this.)
-- Niels.
--
"We humans get marks for consistency. We always opt for
civilization after exhausting the alternatives."
-- Carl Guderian
