[109627] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Re: Recommendation of Tools
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (aawolfe@gmail.com)
Wed Dec 3 02:08:15 2008
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:08:09 +0000
From: aawolfe@gmail.com
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Dec 3, 2008 1:52am, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Andrew Mulholland wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Lee, Steven (NSG Malaysia)
> kin-wei.lee@hp.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi all, do you have any recommended tools that can measure latency/delay
>
> hop by hop basis? Preferable the tools can measure the running (live)
>
> traffic.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> mtr ? - http://www.bitwizard.nl/mtr/
>
>
>
>
> FWIW, Mtr measures latency/delay and loss based on ICMP messages heard
back from the routers on path. As a result, in almost all cases, the real
hop-by-hop latency of actual end-to-end data packets is better than it can
report.
>
>
tcptraceroute is handy for looking at what's going on with tcp
http://michael.toren.net/code/tcptraceroute/
>
> --
>
> Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
>
> Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
>
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George RR Martin: A Clash of Kings
>
>
>
