[109584] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: an over-the-top data center

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Tue Dec 2 01:49:20 2008

Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 07:49:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <D338D1613B32624285BB321A5CF3DB250C827745B9@ginga.ai.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Deepak Jain wrote:

> 3) No one cares if the server farm is blast proof (it isn't), if the 
> connectivity in/out of it gets blasted (submessage: silos were meant to 
> deliver one thing, datacenters aren't in the same operational model once 
> they need connectivity to the outside world)

It's much easier to restore fiber connectivity in a time of crisis than it 
is to source hardware manufacturered at the other end of the world and 
have this set up properly. I do think there is value in keeping the hw 
safer than the connectivity to the outside.

I bet the military or emergency services can establish a 10km fiber 
stretch in a few hours. Replacing some telecom hw and set it up from 
scratch would probably take weeks (I'm not talking about a single router 
here).

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post