[109571] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: EIGRP question...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Ambern)
Mon Dec 1 14:59:07 2008
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:58:46 -0500
From: Jeff Ambern <jambern@grnoc.iu.edu>
To: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon@gmail.com>,
Nanog Mailing list <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1b5c1c150812011149u4ca4fb54s1acdb49afa18c03b@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
How about setting the bandwidth of the link to provider B higher. Or
increasing the delay of the link to provider A? Either of these should work
for you.
On 12/1/08 2:49 PM, "Mike Lyon" <mike.lyon@gmail.com> wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> So I am working on an MPLS migration from provider "A" to provider "B"
> of which both terminate into my core via customer prem routers. I have
> a single EIGRP process between my core and the two customer prem
> routers supplied to me by both providers, of which I don't have access
> to. My question is, I would like to take the routes that come in from
> the neighbor "A" router and apply some kind of metrics to them so they
> are not preferred over the routes learned by the provider "B" router.
>
> Is this possible or would I need to be running different EIGRP
> processes between the two customer prem routers and then play around
> with some redistribution? I am hoping this isn't the case because I
> don't have access to those CPE routers and redistribution is a nasty
> thing...
>
> Thanks in advance for any enlightnment.
>
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
Jeff
