[109489] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Public Assertions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Shultz)
Tue Nov 25 15:23:32 2008
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:13:54 -0800
From: Jeff Shultz <jeffshultz@wvi.com>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081125184557.GA6252@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Can anyone explain why we are being exposed to this? From either side?
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:56:43AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
>> > If I may... I am in possesion of your certified letter
>> > -AND- the signed acknowledgement that you received notice
>> > that I have taken posession of said certified mail.
>> >
>> > please get your facts straight, esp. when making formal
>> > replies to government inqueries. it can only strengthen
>> > your case if you tell the truth.
>>
>> Equally but differently untruthful in my case. Myself, I don't sit around
>> my house all day, breathlessly anticipating a new missive from Dean.
>>
>> -Bill
>
> then what, pray tell, do you do to while away the hours?
> knit? route IP datagrams? carve elaborate totems from ancient redwoods?
> myself, I have taken up Portugese... such an expressive language.
>
> my instruction in the email above was derived from reading the submitted
> comments to the DoC/NOI on securing the DNS. telling us lies is one thing,
> factual mis-statements to the goverment is something else and i
> fail to see how doing so helps ones cause.
>
> in the event that anyone has doubts, I will be glad to scan and post
> the evidence. Dean, care to amend your statements?
>
>
> --bill
>
--
Jeff Shultz
