[109334] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andree Toonk)
Mon Nov 17 11:31:52 2008
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:31:17 +0100
From: Andree Toonk <andree+nanog@toonk.nl>
To: Todd Underwood <todd@renesys.com>
In-Reply-To: <20081113200513.GW20914@renesys.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Hi all,
.-- My secret spy satellite informs me that at Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Todd Underwood wrote:
> that's why i recommend that prefix hijacking detection systems do thresholding of
> peers to prevent a single, rogue, unrepresentative peer from reporting
> a hijacking when none is really happening. others may have a
> different approach, but without thresholding prefix alert systems can
> be noisy and more trouble than they are worth.
For those who like to use a peer threshold, BGPmon.net now has minimum peer
threshold support.
For more information see: http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=88
Cheers,
Andree
