[109268] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alexander Harrowell)
Thu Nov 13 14:56:43 2008
From: "Alexander Harrowell" <a.harrowell@gmail.com>
To: surfer@mauigateway.com
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:56:26 +0000
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
It may be the North American NOG, but it's been said before that it =
functions as a GNOG, G for Global. I don't think Brazil is insignificant. I =
respect Todd's work greatly, but I think he's wrong on this point.
- original message -
Subject: Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer@mauigateway.com>
Date: 13/11/2008 7:42 pm
--- todd@renesys.com wrote:
From: Todd Underwood <todd@renesys.com>
interesting, but it's not operationally significant. i would not
consider the fact that PHAS and Watchmy didn't alert any particular
criticism of them. =20
but perhaps there was something else to which you were referring.
----------------------------------
I think he was just referring to and answering my question. I hope to see =
how these tools work in 'small' incidents as well as large-scale incidents. =
Knowing the tool's capabilities increases one's ability to assess the =
damage while troubleshooting.
scott
