[109118] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Ixia, Juniper going green?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Hannigan)
Wed Nov 5 13:54:44 2008

Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:54:06 -0000
From: "Martin Hannigan" <Martin.Hannigan@verneglobal.com>
To: "Glen Kent" <glen.kent@gmail.com>, "OPS Gurus" <nanog@merit.edu>
X-Skyrr-MailScanner-From: martin.hannigan@verneglobal.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

=20
Going green on your hardware is not necessarily about consumption as it =
is efficiency and I think that there is much difficulty in showing that =
on a piece of hardware without relation to capacity, cooling, or some =
other meaningful output. PUE is reasonable to some extent to measure a =
facilities efficiency.=20
=20
Watts per gig or meg seems a reasonable measure for this and Force10 was =
talking about that ions ago, but I have to wonder why Juniper and IXIA =
aren't doing this in conjunction with the Green Grid.
=20
=20
-M<
=20
--
Martin Hannigan                               hannigan@verneglobal.com =
<mailto:hannigan@verneglobal.com>=20
Verne Global                                  http://www.verneglobal.com =
<http://www.verneglobal.com/>=20
                                              Keflavik, Iceland

________________________________

From: Glen Kent [mailto:glen.kent@gmail.com]
Sent: Wed 05-Nov-08 06:11
To: OPS Gurus
Subject: Ixia, Juniper going green?



http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=3D166871

I wonder what impact this would put on other vendors to turn down
their power consumptions and turn, as Juniper and Ixia like to put it
- Green!

BTW, the specs are a little skewed because they're only measuring
power consumption when the router is only forwarding traffic, i.e.,
there is no traffic going to CPU.

Also any idea about the genesis of this ECR initiative
(http://www.ecrinitiative.org/) and what their eventual goal is ?

Glen





home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post