[109103] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Foster)
Wed Nov 5 04:16:00 2008
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:15:51 +1300 (NZDT)
From: Mark Foster <blakjak@blakjak.net>
To: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1b5c1c150811042335x1199afd4y194818632db34b4f@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I'm sure someone else must've seen it before.
Surely even assymetric peering agreements are mutually beneficial... ISPs
are also content providers, either directly or through their customers...
peering is going to have a flow-on effect in terms of reducing the cost of
offering content to the people you peer with too, right?
Why all the focus on even or non-even-ness of up/down ratios in the first
place?
Mark.
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Mike Lyon wrote:
> Those with bad or uneven ratios then purchase transit and don't let
> themselves get depeered...
>
> On 11/1/08, Nelson Lai <nelson.lai@indiatimes.com> wrote:
>> What I mean is, how come networks like Teleglobe, Limelight, etc. don't get
>> depeered by others, but Cogent does? I'm sure Cogent isn't the only one with
>> bad ratios.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Hyundai to launch the i20 in India. Catch the exclusive preview on
>> ZigWheels.com
>> http://www.zigwheels.com/b2cam/newsDetails.action?name=Emb11_20080731&path=/INDT/News/Emb11_20080731&page=1&pagecount=2&utm_source=indmail&utm_medium=footer&utm_content=tracking&utm_campaign=Nletter_07oct2008_ZW
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
>
