|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:47:18 +0200 From: Colin Alston <karnaugh@karnaugh.za.net> To: Charles Wyble <charles@thewybles.com> In-Reply-To: <4910B14B.9010108@thewybles.com> Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org On 2008/11/04 10:32 PM Charles Wyble wrote: > Obviously as they are consumer connections, I wouldn't get a BGP feed so > would need to download a copy, which has the risk of stale data. Perhaps > some sort of multihop BGP setup? > > I have done some research and found a lot of references to small site > multihoming without BGP for link redundancy but not for traffic > engineering. I've played with that before. Essentially just EBGP Multi-hop with next-hop rewrites on various community prefixes. Of course I had access to a donor feed, that is probably the largest hurdle. There is good use in general for a public no-distribute feed but I have yet to find such a thing. Is there a reason for that, or could I bribe my datacenter to give me a feed and then create my own public server with some el-cheapo Quagga and a bag of rainbows for hope?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |