[108996] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Schwartz)
Mon Nov 3 09:46:48 2008
From: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com>
To: "Valdis. Kletnieks@vt. edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 06:46:24 -0800
In-Reply-To: <60673.1225705866@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: nanog@nanog.org
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: davids@webmaster.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> Quite frankly, if any potential transit provider tried to make
> noises about
> being able to *guarantee* full connectivity, I'd show him the door.
Let's not make the perfect the enemy of the good. All that's required is
that they promise to make a good faith effort to interconnect with anyone
else who makes a similar good faith effort.
Now we can all fight about whether Cogent and/or Sprint are making such a
good faith effort. ;)
DS
