|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:06:59 -0000 In-Reply-To: <9AFB2A51-6EE0-440C-9A71-4C0A4D678455@nosignal.org> From: <michael.dillon@bt.com> To: <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org > On 30 Oct 2008, at 13:03, HRH Sven Olaf Prinz von=20 > CyberBunker-Kamphuis MP wrote: >=20 > > internet exchanges are not per-se "redundant" >=20 > Those networks who *choose* connect to peers via a single=20 > fabric, in a single location, will suffer a similar fate to=20 > those networks who single home to one transit provider. Are you referring to his royal highness' network? <http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=3DAS34109&v=3D4&view=3D2= .0> In any case, if you are really interested in achieving highly reliable connectivity to the Internet, you need to start by engineering it into your design. It's not just a matter of=20 choosing the right mix of peering and transit. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliable_system_design> --Michael Dillon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |