[108810] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Another driver for v6?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Ward)
Wed Oct 29 18:58:51 2008
From: Nathan Ward <nanog@daork.net>
To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <4908E852.4040303@kingrst.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:58:43 +1300
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 30/10/2008, at 11:48 AM, Steven King wrote:
> I personally agree with that. Now only if I can convince our
> management
> to start work on that.
>
> isabel dias wrote:
>> question - "beginning a small deployment of IPv6 now
>> even if its just for internal usage"
>>
>>
>> Sure! there are plenty of reasons .........most obvious one is to
>> feel confortable about ipv6
>>
Another related good reason is so that in 18 months when they decide
they need it done last week, contractors like myself don't charge you
through the nose to implement it because management wouldn't let you
guys skill up on a test network now. That makes it a monetary thing,
something they understand better perhaps..
Yep, this post is going against my best instincts.
--
Nathan Ward
