[108700] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Ward)
Fri Oct 17 20:23:36 2008
From: Nathan Ward <nanog@daork.net>
To: north American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <82abd3a70810170418r58b96c81uc6c366da6936d411@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:23:25 +1300
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 18/10/2008, at 12:18 AM, Michael Simpson wrote:
> On 10/16/08, Truman Boyes <truman@suspicious.org> wrote:
>> It's a good point that you brought up.
>>
>> Even though we already have IPv6 P2P (Nathan's post explains this
>> in more
>> detail), it would still be quite interesting to provide IPv6 as a
>> higher
>> class of traffic within service provider networks.
>>
>
> As long as none of your ipv6 traffic transits across anything from
> British Telecom
> as it is not supported on their 21st Century Network
>
> <http://aaisp.blogspot.com/2008/10/bts-21st-century-network-apparently-not.html
> >
Yeah, except Teredo and 6to4 solve that problem for us today and are
enabled by default on Vista and are used by p2p applications.
Next.
--
Nathan Ward
