[108396] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: paix palo attitude
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Wall)
Wed Oct 1 18:24:12 2008
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:22:31 -0400
From: "Paul Wall" <pauldotwall@gmail.com>
To: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <48E2579F.4020808@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
IIJ had some empty space when I was there the other day, you should
ask them for a feed and some Us. :)
Seriously though, is the requirement to be physically plugged into the
fabric an important one? Might some ebgp multihop feeds to a remote
route collector suffice?
Drive Slow,
Paul Wall
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> we're looking at dropping 2/3 of a rack of routing research measurement
> kit into paix palo alto, and have some questions. considering the price
> of space and power, we want to kinda make sure we'll get the data we need.
>
> we are looking specifically for a large amount of bgp peering data, we
> hope that folk will give us bgp peering though we expect no in- or
> out-bound traffic. think analogously to route views, though the kit on
> our end will be grinding the beans much more finely, espressoBGP :).
>
> pnis are expensive. if we plug into the peering mesh, are any larger
> folk on it?
>
> if not, would we be better off at the linx, at de-cix, at amsix, in
> stockholm?
>
> private replies are probably better as this is not of general interest.
> thanks.
>
> randy
>
>
