[108388] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Google's PUE
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Andersen)
Wed Oct 1 16:48:39 2008
From: David Andersen <dga@cs.cmu.edu>
To: Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0810011614520.5503@soloth.lewis.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:48:32 -0400
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--Apple-Mail-26--226223445
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Oct 1, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
>
>>> OK, green hat off. :) Seriously, I doubt GOOG isn't seeing serious
>>> savings from this over time. If they weren't why would they do it?
>>>
>> They seem to be very environment focused, so I'm sure doing
>> anything that isn't is subject to scrutiny from the rest of the
>> industry.
>
> Personal 747, cough, cough...
>
> I'd bet at their scale, they're saving tens if not hundreds of
> thousands of dollars a month on their data center power bills by
> optimizing power efficiency.
I think you're being overly conservative.
~500,000 computers. (cough; estimate as of 2006) [1]
~150W per computer (google's are supposedly pretty efficient, this
number may be high). that's about 75 megawatts.
= 657,000,000 kWh/year
(if they're all turned on all the time, which recent articles suggest
is probably the case [2]).
$65M per year @ $0.10 per kWh. (possibly an over-estimate with
datacenters located near hydropower dams).
If the average datacenter has a PUE of ~1.9 and google's are at 1.2,
that suggests that they're saving something on the order of $10-20M
per year with power efficiency efforts. Over a million bucks per
month. Not bad. This seems to mesh with the non-scientific, vague
claim in the PUE document that "we save hundreds of millions of kWhs
of electricity" and "cut our operating expenses by tens of millions of
dollars."
There's serious money in improving server efficiency. Green feathers
in the cap, green in the hand...
-Dave
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/14/technology/14search.html?pagewanted=2&ei=5088&en=c96a72bbc5f90a47&ex=1307937600&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
[2] http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-9975495-54.html
--Apple-Mail-26--226223445
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
name=PGP.sig
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkjj4iAACgkQLZyskygNjpyEbgCeL+s7iIF8fDR2OVzmmqMZOFfK
QpkAn0rHRntqtKEDfIpM7M/xWbAAc1dx
=PXNw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail-26--226223445--
