[108290] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: breadcrumbs and collusion

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.)
Fri Sep 26 08:45:53 2008

Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:45:43 -0500
From: "Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
CC: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <C0F2465B4F386241A58321C884AC7ECC0840C7E4@E03MVZ2-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

michael.dillon@bt.com wrote:
>>   However, it makes little sense to close your gate to keep 
>> the stray dogs out of your yard, if they can just come in via 
>> your neighbour's gate and climb over the fences.
> 
> It makes a lot of sense. Having closed your gate, and discovered
> a stray dog in your back yard, you can call the animal control
> people and they stand a good chance of catching that stray dog.


Like most NANAE ...eerrr...NANOG metaphors this one is broken.

We are not talking about stray dogs, were are talking about bad behaviour.

If I keep them from dealing that stuff in my parking lot I do several 
things, in approximate priority order:

My clean customers don't have to suffer any effects of the bad guys 
being on my lot.

The bad guys learn it is not a good place to try to deal.

The Law knows one place they don't have to worry about.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post