[108234] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

breadcrumbs and collusion

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Thu Sep 25 13:40:37 2008

Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:37:15 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: "J. Oquendo" <sil@infiltrated.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080925170651.GB31947@infiltrated.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org


 NANOG makes a fine archive of discoverable material in a court case
intending to show collusion to drive folks out of business.

 One presumes that each ISP here has some form of AUP and rules on 
self-preservation roughly along the lines of "if there is material 
impact to my network or my customers, I can do whatever it takes to 
mitigate the traffic/intrusion".  One does not need to collaberate
with others before enforcing your own AUP.  


--bill


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post