|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:53:17 +0300 (IDT) From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@efes.iucc.ac.il> To: Andree Toonk <andree+nanog@toonk.nl> In-Reply-To: <20080923063353.GA3558@toonk.nl> Cc: nanog@merit.edu Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Andree Toonk wrote: > Not a false positive, It actually was detected by the RIS box in Moscow (rrc13). Strange that it's not visible in RIS search website, but it's definitely in the raw data files. > Looking at that raw data from both routeviews and Ripe, it looks like they (AS8997) 'leaked' a full table, i.e. : > * 217.208 unique prefixes detected by the RIS server in Moscow (ASpath: 2895 3267 8997) > * 250495 seen by routeviews (ASpath: 2895 3267 8997). > (results of quick query: where AS-path contained '3267 8997' update type = advertisement). > > ASpath: 2895 3267 8997 Is that the only ASpath that leaked it? There are others - did they filter properly and only that path failed to filter? Regards, Hank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |