[107773] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: New Intercage upstream
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jon O.)
Fri Sep 12 22:26:16 2008
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:26:10 -0700
From: "Jon O." <nanog@networkcommand.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <27426.1221249301@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 03:55:01PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:24:33 EDT, Lamar Owen said:
>
> > peers carries great weight (as it should, of course). But, in section IV(I)
> > PIE makes a connection guarantee. That is their right to do, obviously, but
>
> Playing devil's advocate here - it guarantees a connection, but does it also
> guarantee that PIE won't null-route any of the customer's packets trying to
> leave PIE's network at an upstream peer/transit point? :)
>
> However, if Gadi's claim that they don't seem to have any clients other than
> Intercage is right, I'm sure the correct term for the connection guarantee
> is "bulletproof"...
Looks like this might be somewhat bulletproof, check the other sites off this "AS"
http://www.robtex.com/dns/pacificinternetexchange.net.html#a2
