[107700] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jo Rhett)
Thu Sep 11 12:57:39 2008
From: Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com>
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0809111630030.9384@netcore.fi>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:57:23 -0700
Cc: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com, nanog@merit.edu, k claffy <kc@caida.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sep 11, 2008, at 6:32 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:
> FWIW, based on off-list discussion, Jo's disagreement seems to stem
> from a misunderstanding of how loose uRPF works (he didn't know it
> accepts any packet that has a route in the routing table).
Um, no. Because if you put loose mode uRPF on your edges you aren't
implementing BCP38 now are you?
I don't care how it is deployed. That's your job ;-)
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomness
