[107525] in North American Network Operators' Group
BCP IETFs and RFCs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Blanchard)
Thu Sep 4 23:40:34 2008
From: "Joe Blanchard" <joe@sumless.net>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 23:39:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20080904230821.A48897809@relayer.avian.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Well at the risk of getting flammed here.. lol
=20
I don't believe there is a real clear answer here to this BCP38 debate.
Great suggestions, great comments, and great what ifs.
>From the old days, I always recalled ACLing non-existant scopes within =
my
nets, again not that that is the
answer, but it was a recommended practice, and when we saw non-existant
spaces trying to leave one of our feeds it was quickly handled =
internally
(i.e. killed the downstream link). As well we always had to do an =
internal
audit of why/who/where the event took place and a remedy to it (HIPAA & =
SOX
compliance stuff)
While this thread is informative at times, I think the name calling and
insults really serve no purpose to it.
I recall a funny saying regarding this, opinions are like a......s, =
everyone
has one and everyone else thinks it stinks. Doesn't mean anyones right.
Agree to dis-agree and lets be on with it.=20
Deja-vu, Wasn't there a thread about this same subject a while ago =
something
regarding RFC2827? Might just be me.=20
Just my 2=A2s
Regards,
-Joe Blanchard
"I am Joe Blanchard and I approve this message.... lol"
