[107139] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: interger to I P address
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matlock, Kenneth L)
Wed Aug 27 09:46:50 2008
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 07:46:36 -0600
In-Reply-To: <927635FD-B59B-472E-83BD-95C8B6086CF5@muada.com>
From: "Matlock, Kenneth L" <MatlockK@exempla.org>
To: "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Huh, learn something new every day!
Well, at least my method shows the underlying theory behind how the
conversion works :)
Thanks!
Ken Matlock
Network Analyst
(303) 467-4671
matlockk@exempla.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [mailto:iljitsch@muada.com]=20
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 6:27 AM
To: Matlock, Kenneth L
Cc: Colin Alston; kcc; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: interger to I P address
On 27 aug 2008, at 14:18, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
> Easiest way.
$ ping 1089055123
PING 1089055123 (64.233.169.147): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 64.233.169.147: icmp_seq=3D0 ttl=3D242 time=3D105.418 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.169.147: icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D242 time=3D105.891 ms
^C
--- 1089055123 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev =3D 105.418/105.655/105.891/0.236 ms
:-)
