[107083] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Native v6 with Level(3)?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue Aug 26 01:33:49 2008
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:33:41 -0400
From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: "Kyle Murray" <kyle@forest.net>
In-Reply-To: <48AF4A41.8050107@forest.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 8/22/08, Kyle Murray <kyle@forest.net> wrote:
> Here is the response I got from L3 when I inquired about IPV6:
>
> "The answer to your questions is "no", we have not yet inplemented IPV6 for
> our customers yet. IPV4 is the de facto on our backbone nad alledge router
> on which customers connectc."
>
> Poor spelling aside, it seems they have not implemented it yet. If someone
> manages to get them to implement, I would really like to hear about it.
>
wow that is odd.. since stewart bamford has been off giving ipv6
deployment talks to various conferences (including this one:
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0510/bamford.html )
maybe L3's support staff should check their internal documentation??
Slide 17 says: "Deployment completed Q3 2005"... so, they apparently
have it, can get it to you and do 6PE (or did 6PE a bit ago). Maybe
ask again and aim the nay-sayer to the nanog preso and ask them to
call stewart up directly?
-chris
