[107015] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: uTorrent, IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Ward)
Wed Aug 20 00:48:15 2008
From: Nathan Ward <nanog@daork.net>
To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0808192053190.15314@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:48:06 +1200
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 20/08/2008, at 6:57 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
>
>> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/18/226228&from=rss
>
> Well, IPv6 usage is actually increasing fairly rapidly, anyway:
>
> <http://www.ams-ix.net/technical/stats/sflow/?type=ipv6>
>
> So, still, usage is not very impressive (and some of that might be
> NNTP traffic), but slant of the yearly graph actually is.
Yep, and you're only seeing native data there.
Do you have any bead on how much of the IPv4 data is protocol 41 (I.e.
IPv6 tunnelled over IPv4)?
I'm not going to ask you to find out how much of it is Teredo - that
requires stateful DPI - but I expect it to be a non-insignificant
number.
Those numbers can't be added together, because depending on a couple
of factors (ie public relays and things), tunnelled traffic could be
counted twice - once when encapsulated, once when native.
--
Nathan Ward
