[106965] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Siler)
Mon Aug 18 18:03:50 2008
From: Sean Siler <Sean.Siler@microsoft.com>
To: Charles Wyble <charles@thewybles.com>, "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:02:30 -0700
In-Reply-To: <48A9EFC5.9040900@thewybles.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Yep - absolutely. I was referring to built-in support from the stack.
Dibbler is the primary third party provider we have seen for DHCPv6 support=
on downlevel clients.
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Wyble [mailto:charles@thewybles.com]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 2:55 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6
Sean Siler wrote:
> Nope. XP does not support DHCPv6 - only Vista/Windows Server 2008 (and la=
ter) can do that.
>
> Sean
http://internecine.eu/systems/windows_xp-ipv6.html and
http://internecine.eu/software/dibbler_dhcpv6.html discuss how to deploy
dhcpv6 on xp. It's 3rd party but doable.
