[106874] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marshall Eubanks)
Fri Aug 15 09:35:24 2008

From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <48A58414.5090704@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:33:45 -0400
Cc: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs@seastrom.com>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org



On Aug 15, 2008, at 9:26 AM, Randy Bush wrote:

>> In other words, our earlier estimate of 60% was way off...  you can
>> get 92.1% effectiveness at bogon filtering by just dropping 1918
>> addresses, a filter that you will never have to change.
>
> my read is that the 60% was an alleged 60% of attacks came from *all*
> bogon space.  this now seems in the low single digit percentge.  of
> that, the majority is from 1918 space.
>

If (trying to reverse engineer this thread) previously 60% of all  
attacks
came from bogonspace, and now only 2.96% do, that does not mean that
if the bogon filters are removed, that number will stay at < 3 %. It may
just mean that the filtering is effective.

Regards
Marshall



> randy
>



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post