[106857] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Danny McPherson)
Fri Aug 15 01:45:14 2008
From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
To: "Paul Ferguson" <fergdawg@netzero.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080814.223756.21174.0@webmail19.vgs.untd.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:44:50 -0600
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Aug 14, 2008, at 11:37 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>>
> Okay, I admit I haven't paid the closest attention to RPKI, but I
> have to ask: Is this a two-way shared-key issue, or (worse) a case
> where we need to rely on a central entity to be a key clearinghouse?
>
> The reason why I mention this is obvious -- the entire PKI effort
> has been stalled (w.r.t. authority) because of this particular
> issue.
>
> Any thoughts on that?
See Randy et al's presentation here:
<http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0610/bush.html>
In short, the latter, which is precisely DRC's point.
-danny
