[106830] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Freedman)
Thu Aug 14 14:08:20 2008
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:21:41 +0100
From: David Freedman <david.freedman@uk.clara.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <c93a55220808140834j692827eci22681833218bb372@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> but, why wouldn't something like formally requiring
> customers/peers/transits/etc to have radb objects as a 'requirement'
> for peering/customer bgp services
>
Step 1 : Enforce IRR for customers *now*.
Step 2 : Enforce trusted replacement for IRR when available
Step 3 : Profit
Not progressing to step 1 today because you think IRR isn't the best
solution is like not deploying IPv6 because you sat on your arse not
deploying it all these years and justify yourself by denouncing the
protocol on every mailing list and IRC channel at every available
opportunity.
Dave.
