[106802] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Donelan)
Wed Aug 13 17:10:11 2008
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:09:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0808132252320.335@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> We have prefix-filters on our customer bgp sessions, so that should be fairly
> safe, but I see no good way of doing this towards peers as there is no
> uniform way of doing this, and there is no industry consenus how it should be
> done.
Read your peering contract with the other ISP. It should cover what to do
if this happens.
What? you don't have a peering contract with the other ISP. Well I guess
there is no requirement to keep the peering session established if the
peer does stuff you don't want on your network.
If it hurts when you do something, why do you keep doing it?
