[10680] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Craig A. Huegen)
Fri Jul 11 18:38:30 1997
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 15:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Craig A. Huegen" <c-huegen@quadrunner.com>
To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@scruz.net>
cc: Andrew Partan <asp@partan.com>, Matthew Kaufman <matthew@nic.scruz.net>,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199707112148.OAA17797@scruz.net>
On Fri, 11 Jul 1997, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
==>I redistribute in a similar way, and have the statics to null0 as well.
==>
==>Still insisted on flapping at least twice every time it got the brief
==>hit on the /24 subnet coming from the outside world.
What routing protocol do you use? If you're using a protocol which uses a
hold-down (read: RIP), the holddown period causes the route to be
withdrawn while marked as inaccessible in the IGP, and re-announced when
the hold-down period goes away and the static route gets inserted.
/cah
