[10675] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Partan)
Fri Jul 11 17:45:28 1997
From: Andrew Partan <asp@partan.com>
To: matthew@scruz.net (Matthew Kaufman)
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 17:26:41 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199707112107.OAA12592@scruz.net> from "Matthew Kaufman" at Jul 11, 97 02:07:36 pm
> provider, and we have "summary-only" set in our BGP configuration. Every
Try it w/o the summary-only stuff.
I don't use summary-only, or aggregate-address, or network XXX at
all. I redis my connected & static routes into bgp and arrange
for my global routes to make it beyond my AS. I also use pull up
static routes to null0 for all of my blocks.
Try it this way & see if it make things more stable.
--asp@partan.com (Andrew Partan)
