[106650] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Thu Aug 7 18:59:29 2008

Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:59:20 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Rob Thomas <robt@cymru.com>
In-Reply-To: <489B6B67.9010202@cymru.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

rob,

> If the source of a scan or probe is a bogon, we tag it that way in our
> data store.  I went back to 2008-01 and found the following percentages
> of bogons in our data:
> 
>    2008-01: 0.001095262%
>    2008-02: 0.001759343%
>    2008-03: 0.001619555%
>    2008-04: 0.001433908%
>    2008-05: 0.001182351%
>    2008-06: 0.130534559%
>    2008-07: 0.002327683%
>    2008-08: 0.001258054% (thus far)

this is an extremely far cry from 60%.  what am i not understanding?

and can you separate reserved (127, ...) and unallocated?

randy


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post