[106602] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Darden, Patrick S.)
Wed Aug 6 13:19:22 2008
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:19:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <13A7D55B-AA45-4419-8C47-775A36A17563@multicasttech.com>
From: "Darden, Patrick S." <darden@armc.org>
To: "Marshall Eubanks" <tme@multicasttech.com>,
"Joel Jaeggli" <joelja@bogus.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Actually, rereading this, I agree. My experience is large companies =
take it all, using huge swathes inefficiently, instead of doing it =
right. In my previous post I was answering the question I thought you =
were asking, not your real question.
I agree with you both.
I think that RFC1918 Could work, if companies used it correctly.... =
Again, though, I have only run into one company that used it correctly. =
IPV6, you are our only hope! (obiwan kenobi, you are our only hope!)
--p
Joel said
>
> How much of 10/8 and 172.16/12 does an organization with ~80k =20
> employees, on 5 continents, with hundreds of extranet connections to =20
> partners and suppliers in addition to numerous aquistions and the =20
> occasional subsidiary who also use 10/8 and 172.16/12 use?
Marshall said
In my experience, effectively all of it.
>
