[106496] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: [funsec] Subject line misleading. AT&T Pwned. Sweet Irony:
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Skywing)
Thu Jul 31 00:25:33 2008
From: Skywing <Skywing@valhallalegends.com>
To: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com>, Suresh Ramasubramanian
<ops.lists@gmail.com>, Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org>, "nanog@nanog.org"
<nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:25:18 -0500
In-Reply-To: <2d106eb50807302112h69af707boe3f32c6b81e5a32c@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
If you don't mind OpenDNS proxying all your Google searches, sure. < http:=
//blog.metasploit.com/2008/07/on-dns-attacks-in-wild-and-journalistic.html =
>
Personally, I would never use OpenDNS. Tactics like that are not particula=
rly acceptable in my book, well-meaning or not. Not, however, trying to st=
art a political debate - but OpenDNS does do a bit more than just act as a =
plain DNS resolver for you, and you should make that aware to anyone who us=
es it.
- S
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Hannigan [mailto:hannigan@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:13 AM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian; Gadi Evron; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: [funsec] Subject line misleading. AT&T Pwned. Sweet Irony: Met=
asploit Creator a Victim of His Own Creation (fwd)
Not so quick. Privacy policy?
-M<
On 7/30/08, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org> wrote:
>> I guess history decided the previous discussion in favor of vix. Althoug=
h
>> I
>> doubt vix sees this compromise at ATT as a victory, but rather a loss.
>>
>> Note: HD has not been compromised.
>
> Well so if any of you uses an iphone to surf the net now's the time to
> see if an iphone's nameservers can be changed to opendns :)
>
>
--
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
