|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:11:22 -0400 From: "Christian Koch" <christian@broknrobot.com> To: "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.nether.net> In-Reply-To: <F59EFDB5-D7B2-4854-9358-EC5486130E90@puck.nether.net> Cc: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org solera makes some nice boxes also On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote: > Check out packet forensics depending on what your ultimate requirements > are. > > Jared Mauch > > > On Jul 29, 2008, at 7:10 PM, "John A. Kilpatrick" <john@hypergeek.net> > wrote: > > >> We've deployed a bunch taps in our network and now we need a platform on >> which to capture the data. Our bandwidth is currently pretty low but I've >> got 8 links to tap, which means I need 16 ports. Has anyone done any >> research on doing accurate packet capture with commodity hardware? >> >> >> -- >> John A. Kilpatrick >> john@hypergeek.net Email| http://www.hypergeek.net/ >> john-page@hypergeek.net Text pages| ICQ: 19147504 >> remember: no obstacles/only challenges >> >> >> >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |