[106444] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Software router state of the art
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew D Kirch)
Mon Jul 28 17:31:24 2008
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:30:34 -0400
From: Andrew D Kirch <trelane@trelane.net>
To: "Rev. Jeffrey Paul" <sneak@datavibe.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080728212120.GC22194@datavibe.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Rev. Jeffrey Paul wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:08:32PM +0100, michael.dillon@bt.com wrote:
>
>> But if you want free suggestions, then you'll have to put up with
>> half answers, vendor fanboys, and the usual ruckus of NANOG.
>>
>>
>
> As much as I hate to contribute to the problem, I'd like to point out
> that the barrage of useless, off-topic, empty traffic on this list in
> the last week is, in my estimation, quite a bit above the "usual" ruckus
> of NANOG.
>
> While I'm not one to thunk down the rulebook, can you all collectively
> knock it off?
>
> Cheers,
> -jp
I haven't followed the other threads in the last week, but I don't think
that a discussion of routers is off topic. While Michael's opinion was
expressed in a fairly tongue-in-cheek method as would be required by his
response, I don't see anything offtopic, perhaps just hotly worded.
Anderw
