[106412] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Software router state of the art

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Seth Mattinen)
Mon Jul 28 13:55:38 2008

Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:53:04 -0700
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <C0F2465B4F386241A58321C884AC7ECC0745A590@E03MVZ2-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

michael.dillon@bt.com wrote:
>> but knowing how bad Linux is at being a router and that their 
>> products are Linux-based, I'm afraid to give one a try. J 
>> products are based on a competing non-Linux platform that has 
>> a better reputation for routing.
> 
> Enough with the bipartisan politics. There are more choices than 
> just Linux and FreeBSD for software routing.
> 
> Click for instance <http://read.cs.ucla.edu/click/>
> 
> --Michael Dillon
> 


Thanks for being oh-so-helpful with a serious question. Got any useful 
answers for me? Give me a vendor that offers your suggestion. I don't 
have time for a make-it-myself solution.

~Seth


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post