[106248] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Paul Vixie: Re: [dns-operations] DNS issue accidentally leaked?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Deepak Jain)
Thu Jul 24 16:41:15 2008

Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:39:31 -0400
From: Deepak Jain <deepak@ai.net>
To: Richard Parker <richard@electrophobia.com>
In-Reply-To: <6CD95D88-8EF9-4C13-AB98-700D1FECD84B@electrophobia.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Reply-To: deepak@ai.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

> For one iPhone it reported 209.183.54.151 as having GREAT source port 
> randomness and GREAT transaction ID randomness.  However, despite the 
> test reporting GREAT, the source ports were _definitely_ non-random.
> 
> http://5d93b9656563a44e4c900ff9.et.dns-oarc.net/
> 


"Proving random" is not easy. Proving random that isn't done by certain 
methods (i.e. certain algorithms or certain sources of entropy) is easier.

Deepak


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post