[106089] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Line rate gigabit router/switch options
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kevin Blackham)
Sat Jul 19 22:58:32 2008
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:58:16 -0600
From: "Kevin Blackham" <blackham@gmail.com>
To: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>, "Brant I. Stevens" <branto@branto.com>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080717235729.D33A44500E@ptavv.es.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
If you don't need a full table or 10G, a sup32 6503 chassis bundle is
very affordable. 8 sfp and 1 copper port for about 9k after discount.
- Original message -
> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:17:12 -0400 > From: "Brant I. Stevens" <bra...
On 7/17/08, Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:17:12 -0400
>> From: "Brant I. Stevens" <branto@branto.com>
>>
>> What about a 6524 switch? Or a Juniper EX 4200?
>
> 6524? Sounds like a bit of overkill to me.
>
> As far as the EX4200, it might do the job in a bit, but, as of the
> latest JunOS release, too many features are supported for us to use them
> as full-function routers. Maybe in a release or two (late this year),
> they will be ready. The hardware is most impressive.
>
> Note that they will not handle full routes. I believe that they do about
> 12K routes, so they may be fine for you application. They do all of the
> "standard" protocols, but they don't so MPLS yet. I'm not quite sure
> when this will make it into JunOS.
>
> I'm quite impressed with the potential of this box and, as a layer 2
> switch, they run very well. Just some serious limitations for layer
> 3.
> --
> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail:
> oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C
> 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
>
--
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
