[10586] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ATM vs. DS3
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vadim Antonov)
Thu Jul 10 06:09:42 1997
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 02:38:49 -0700
From: Vadim Antonov <avg@pluris.com>
To: chris@nap.net, karl@Mcs.Net
Cc: jbeck@connectnet.com, nanog@merit.edu
Karl Denninger <karl@Mcs.Net> wrote:
>My God, someone admits it?
>I've used 20% as the general ATM overhead now for almost two years, and have
>been poo-pooed by lots of people claiming that it wasn't anywhere near that
>bad.
Now, now, that was beaten to death at many lists including NANOG.
What have you been, hybernating?
The ATM overhead depends a lot on small things like if you use SNAP
or not, etc.
--vadim
