[105801] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens upPandora's Box
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tomas L. Byrnes)
Tue Jul 1 15:26:00 2008
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 12:25:38 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20080701184824.GN19135@cgi.jachomes.com>
From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb@byrneit.net>
To: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@baylink.com>,
<nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Shouldn't we take all the ICANNt and DNS Related stuff to
dns-operations?
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Jay R. Ashworth [mailto:jra@baylink.com]=20
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:48 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens
upPandora's Box of
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 12:04:57PM +0100, Roland Perry wrote:
> In article <20080630212216.GJ8195@cgi.jachomes.com>, Jay R. Ashworth=20
> <jra@baylink.com> writes
> >The Domain Name System is not now, and never has been, away to *find*
> >things, anymore than 123 Elm St, Worcester MA is a way to *find* a=20
> >house.
>=20
> What about "1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA" ?
Or 1 Tech Data Drive, Largo, or 1 Infinite Loop; yeah, there are lots of
good examples of why addresses are random and shouldn't be used to
*locate* things... except as keys into directories.
Cheers,
-- jra
--=20
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
jra@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think
RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com
'87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727
647 1274
Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
Those who count the vote decide everything.
-- (Joseph Stalin)
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.=20
Version: 8.0.101 / Virus Database: 270.4.3/1528 - Release Date: 7/1/2008
7:26 AM
