[105567] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: uceprotect.net
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Fri Jun 27 10:42:57 2008
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:12:43 +0530
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: "Drew Weaver" <drew.weaver@thenap.com>
In-Reply-To: <B7152C470C9BF3448ED33F16A75D81C14D33823F95@exchanga.thenap.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Do you actually have a problem beyond "ZOMG, dnsstuff.com says I am in
uceprotect?". Its not a list that I personally would waste time with.
BTW, the kind of issue that often affects "cost effective" colo shops
- so-called snowshoe spam - typically HAS matching forward and
reverse.
srs
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver@thenap.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone, this is possibly off-topic here, not entirely sure.
>
> I'm kind of confused about some of uceprotect's policies, they seem to require every IP address to have reverse DNS with matching forwards (which works fine for a wireless/broadband/dial-up ISP, but not so much for a
