[1054] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Routing wars pending?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim Bass)
Thu Nov 16 13:47:46 1995
From: Tim Bass <bass@dune.silkroad.com>
To: rgm3@is.chrysler.com (Robert Moskowitz)
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1995 13:22:23 -0500 (EST)
Cc: big-internet@munnari.OZ.AU, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <9511161709.AA17675@clhubgw1.is.chrysler.com> from "Robert Moskowitz" at Nov 16, 95 12:09:09 pm
Absolutely agree with both Robert and Vadim that DNS need to be revised
in a big way. I especially would like to see the MX record concept
applied to information services (IX maybe), i.e.
foo.bar.org. IN A 198.133.151.19
IX 10 fooU2.bar.org.
IX 20 foo2U2.bar.org.
IX 30 whoU2.maybe.com.
IX 40 tryMe2.friendly.com.
www.bar.org. IN CNAME foo.bar.org.
Has this simple concept been proposed in an IETF draft unknown to
us ugly ducklings :-)
Quack.
Tim
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Tim Bass | #include<campfire.h> |
| Principal Network Systems Engineer | for(beer=100;beer>1;beer++){ |
| The Silk Road Group, Ltd. | take_one_down(); |
| | pass_it_around(); |
| http://www.silkroad.com/ | } |
| | back_to_work(); /*never reached */ |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Tim Bass | #include<campfire.h> |
| Principal Network Systems Engineer | for(beer=100;beer>1;beer++){ |
| The Silk Road Group, Ltd. | take_one_down(); |
| | pass_it_around(); |
| http://www.silkroad.com/ | } |
| | back_to_work(); /*never reached */ |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
