[105338] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin Shore)
Wed Jun 18 00:10:57 2008
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:10:39 -0500
From: Justin Shore <justin@justinshore.com>
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <485878d2.qzmcM+qfoe5r1k3u%ops.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Is the whole AS (33302) rogue like the AS advertising the SF Bay Packet
Radio block is? Looking at the WHOIS for some of the prefixes
advertised by both ASs, I see some common company names. That would
lead me to believe that 33302 is no better than 33211 but I can't
confirm that. Any takers?
Justin
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Another legacy /16, after the previous one - the sf bay packet radio /16
>
> http://www.47-usc-230c2.org/chapter3.html
>
> This time 128.168/16 - and by the same group that seems to have acquired
> control of the earlier one.
>
> --srs
>
