[104916] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Power/temperature monitoring
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Rubenstein)
Fri May 30 11:28:42 2008
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:27:46 -0400
In-Reply-To: <200805301510.m4UFAv70006213@lava.sentex.ca>
From: "Alex Rubenstein" <alex@corp.nac.net>
To: "Mike Tancsa" <mike@sentex.net>,
<frnkblk@iname.com>,
<nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
We've started using ControlByWeb, specifically
http://www.controlbyweb.com/temperature/index.html .. POE, and handles
four probes. We just don't use their probes, we buy them elsewhere (it's
plain old one wire).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:mike@sentex.net]
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 11:11 AM
> To: frnkblk@iname.com; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Power/temperature monitoring
>=20
> At 10:58 AM 5/30/2008, Frank Bulk wrote:
>=20
> >Required:
> >- temperature sensor
> >- 110 VAC power monitoring (on/off, not necessarily current)
> >- Ethernet interface (at least SNMP, Web GUI and
>=20
> We have been using "Uptime Devices". Our units have room for 3
> sensors (we have 2 temp and one for humidity). Web, SNMP, ethernet,
> external AC power blob. Its a fairly small form factor and it has
> been reliable for us over the years. Alerts work as expected and
> havent had any false positives either over the years.
>=20
> ---Mike
