[104634] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert E. Seastrom)
Wed May 21 22:25:03 2008
To: Tony Varriale <tvarriale@comcast.net>
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs@seastrom.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 22:24:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: <003d01c8bb99$0404c130$f211a8c0@flamwsugsmul5v> (Tony Varriale's
message of "Wed, 21 May 2008 18:18:42 -0500")
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
It's always been possible to get resources by lying or committing
fraud - the common law crime of obtaining property by false pretenses
predates the Internet by a substantial margin.
---rob
"Tony Varriale" <tvarriale@comcast.net> writes:
> Yup. You can horde.
>
> You can easily justify a /23 these days and not be multihomed still
> get a /22.
>
> tv
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pete Templin" <petelists@templin.org>
> To: "Tony Varriale" <tvarriale@comcast.net>
> Cc: <nanog@nanog.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 3:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?
>
>
>> Tony Varriale wrote:
>>> Thanks for the info. We needed larger than /22 anyways.
>>>
>>> I am a bit surprised that they will hand out a small allocaiton for
>>> multihomers. These days it's very easy to do. And, could be a
>>> easy way to horde some v4.
>>
>> Nope, you can horde a /24 for a single device, but it's
>> provider-assigned. If you can't justify a /23 -now-, you don't
>> qualify for an ARIN multihomers' /22.
>>
>> pt
