[104466] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [NANOG] Questions about NETCONF

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Fri May 16 07:23:59 2008

Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:22:20 +0200
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: John Payne <john@sackheads.org>
In-Reply-To: <9219BF27-1533-406B-8D7D-95255E6A7774@sackheads.org>
Cc: 'nanog list' <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

> I've personally been waiting for the data modeling to be  
> standardized.  Yes, it's great and wonderful to have a consistent  
> method of talking to network devices, but I also want a standard data  
> model along with it.

does this not imply that all devices would need to be semantically
congruent?  if so, is this realistic?

randy

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post