[104466] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [NANOG] Questions about NETCONF
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Fri May 16 07:23:59 2008
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:22:20 +0200
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: John Payne <john@sackheads.org>
In-Reply-To: <9219BF27-1533-406B-8D7D-95255E6A7774@sackheads.org>
Cc: 'nanog list' <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> I've personally been waiting for the data modeling to be
> standardized. Yes, it's great and wonderful to have a consistent
> method of talking to network devices, but I also want a standard data
> model along with it.
does this not imply that all devices would need to be semantically
congruent? if so, is this realistic?
randy
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog