[104306] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Niels Bakker)
Mon May 5 18:58:14 2008
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 00:57:40 +0200
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <6DC81747-86D4-47EF-9339-B7FDFB7A2BB1@muada.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
* iljitsch@muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum) [Mon 05 May 2008, 10:09 CEST]:
> PS. Am I the only one who is annoyed by the reduction in usable
> subject space by the superfluous [NANOG]?
No, and I'm just as annoyed by the (non-McQ) footer with superfluous
information attached to each mail.
On 5 mei 2008, at 17:14, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> Those of us who are *really* annoyed by stuff like that usually cook
> up a procmail recipe to strip it out.. :)
That will only lead to duplicates of "Re: " (before and after the tag)
in the Subject, I'm afraid.
-- Niels.
--
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
